Carrier call data records hold a bevy of information about
wireless subscribers, their calling patterns and details about
network traffic. Until recently, however, wireless operators
overlooked or underused much of this data. With shrinking
margins and increasing pressure to improve revenues, wireless
operators now are looking closely at ways to use this data to
their advantage.
Plenty of firms are ready and willing to assist operators
in making better use of their call data records. Companies
such as Vibrant Solutions, Teradata, Netezza and others can
help carriers store their data records and then use software
tools to mine the records for valuable information that can
lead to cost savings. For example, carriers can use their call
data records to determine when their compensation for
interconnection is inadequate. Or in the case of a roaming
caller, they can use the information to determine the home
carrier and properly charge for that call. Some carriers use
the call detail records to reconcile with their network
elements. By comparing their call data records with events on
their network, carriers can determine whether other wireless
operators, CLECs or wireline operators have properly
compensated them for traffic or other network events.
LNP
And Other Issues Although these types of calling
scenarios have existed on carrier networks for a number of
years, the advent of local number portability (LNP) has
further complicated the compensation process. "Issues of
carriers terminating traffic and identifying the calls
properly became more complicated with local number
portability," says Yves Robinson, director of revenue assurance at
Vibrant Solutions, a maker of revenue assurance solutions for Tier
1 and Tier 2 carriers. "And these issues aren't getting
easier. We have to constantly tweak our applications."
Accudata Technologies, a firm that provides data
validation, has developed a new product specifically for
operators that want more information regarding their customers
who have their numbers ported. By using Accudata's Operating
Company Name Lookup service, carriers can find out within 24
hours where their subscribers have ported. According to
Accudata Technologies CEO M. Gregory Smith, the company has
had success with the product from its CLEC customers and hopes
wireless carriers will see the same value.
Besides LNP, new data services such as SMS and content
downloads have made call data records even more complex. This
additional caller information increases the likelihood of
leakage and complicates revenue settlement. "Once you get into
content, settlement assurance is a big deal," says Bryan
Truex, senior director, global industry consulting, financial
management and revenue
assurance at Teradata, a provider of data
storage, analysis and asset management products. Teradata
customers include Cingular Wireless, AT&T Wireless,
Verizon Wireless and Sprint. "Not only does a carrier have to
maintain revenue
assurance around the points of interconnect,
but there are also multiple layers of content partners" that
must be paid for their portion of the content
provisioning.
Teradata and other revenue
assurance firms typically store and analyze the
data and then provide that data to the carrier's billing
platform, which then processes the invoices. "We provide the
foundation layer of architecture," Truex says.
As cell phones become more like computers, allowing
customers to access all types of data via 3G networks, vendors
say that carriers will see an even greater up-tick in
information that they can glean from call data records. "Once
you get into 3G and content analysis, you have URLs and
information about content that the mobile user has accessed
and that is contained in the call data record," Truex says.
"Not just voice, but data and other information has to be
carried in the call data record."
That plethora of call data information can be helpful in a
number of ways, including using the information as a marketing
tool for operators. According to Jit Saxena, CEO and
co-founder of Netezza, operators can use the data from calling
records to determine the effectiveness of marketing programs
and tailor specific rate plans to certain customer groups. By
looking at the records during a promotion, carriers can see
whether they are spending their marketing dollars in the most
financially effective manner. "They can look at 180 days of
call data records and understand trends," Saxena says. And the
more carriers understand about individual customer calling
patterns, the better they are able to structure calling plans
that will appeal to those subscribers. "It's simply a matter
of understanding what a customer is doing and who they are
calling on a regular basis," Saxena says. "If I call the U.K.
all the time and my carrier comes to me with a plan that is
tailored to that type of calling, chances are I will stay with
that carrier."
Significant Savings Exactly how much
carriers can save by employing various revenue assurance tools varies
according to the size of the operator and the type of system
that they implement. Vibrant works with a number of carriers,
including Nextel Communications and Qwest. Robinson estimates
that carriers can secure anywhere from $6 million to $30
million in lost revenue annually by finding and billing for
these types of data discrepancies.
In one case study with a carrier using Vibrant's revenue
integrity service in which the company validates billing for
all services provided, the carrier customer recovered $8
million in lost revenue annually. In a second case study, one
in which Vibrant analyzed 200 million call records per day and
looked specifically at LNP issues, the carrier saw an annual
increase of $6 million in reciprocal compensation billing.
For wireless operators facing increasing pressure to keep
margins high, putting a plug in the revenue leaks by storing
and analyzing call data records could make a significant
difference to the bottom line. And unlike other
revenue-generating services, deploying revenue assurance solutions doesn't
require a significant upgrade to the
network.